For over a century, England and France clashed in a brutal struggle known as the Hundred Years’ War. This series of battles, alliances, and betrayals defined the course of both nations. More than just a military conflict, it reshaped economies, royal power, and national identities. The war’s outcome would leave lasting effects on the political landscapes of Europe, influencing how kingdoms waged war and governed their people.
Background of the Conflict
The Hundred Years’ War didn’t erupt overnight. It was the result of deep-seated tensions between England and France. These two kingdoms shared a complicated relationship, bound by proximity, shifting alliances, and contested claims. Understanding the conflict’s roots requires a closer look at the political pressures, personal ambitions, and emerging national rivalries that set the stage for over a century of war.
Stay Curious – Subscribe to Our Monthly History Wanderer Newsletter!
Roots of Tension
Political and territorial disputes were a major source of strife between the two kingdoms. By the 12th century, English monarchs held vast lands in France, primarily through the marriage of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine. These territories, such as Normandy, Gascony, and Aquitaine, were technically French but ruled by English kings as vassals. This awkward arrangement bred constant friction. French monarchs sought to tighten their control, while English kings jealously guarded their holdings.
In addition, trade disputes added fuel to the fire. The French crown often interfered with English access to critical resources, especially the lucrative wine trade in Gascony. The economic stakes were high, and neither side was willing to compromise. These issues created long-standing resentment that neither kingdom could ignore—an invisible fuse smoldering for decades.
Claim to the French Throne
When French King Charles IV died in 1328 without a male heir, the question of succession threw the monarchy into crisis. Edward III of England believed he had a legitimate claim to the French throne through his mother, Isabella, Charles IV’s sister. Under feudal law, Edward’s lineage made him a credible contender. However, French nobles rejected Edward’s claim, citing the Salic law, which barred inheritance through the female line.
Instead, the French crown passed to Philip VI, a cousin of the late king. This decision was a slap in the face to Edward, who felt politically undermined and personally insulted. What began as a royal disagreement soon escalated. Edward’s bid for the throne wasn’t just about power—it was about pride. By 1337, Edward refused to pay homage to Philip VI for his French territories, a direct challenge to Philip’s authority, and war erupted soon after.
National Identity and Rivalry
National identity was still taking shape during the 14th century, but the Hundred Years’ War played a crucial role in its evolution. For both England and France, the conflict became a defining struggle that united their people against a common enemy.
In England, the war fueled a sense of patriotism. Military victories, like the Battle of Crécy, weren’t just triumphs for the king—they were celebrated as achievements for all Englishmen. The use of the English language in government and literature grew during this time as people embraced a shared national culture.
France experienced a similar transformation. The war forced a fragmented nation of regional loyalties to rally around the idea of a united France. Even in defeat, French leaders leaned on the concept of shared heritage to inspire resistance. Figures like Joan of Arc, who embodied this sense of unity, became symbols of French identity and resilience.
The war wasn’t just a military battle—it was also an emotional and cultural struggle. It helped solidify the idea of what it meant to be “English” or “French,” forever changing the way these nations saw themselves.
Key Battles of the Hundred Years’ War
The Hundred Years’ War is a story of strategy, resilience, and shifting fortunes. Across its span, three battles stand out for their impact on the war’s progression and their long-lasting consequences. These clashes not only shaped the course of the war but also revealed evolving tactics in medieval warfare.
Battle of Crécy (1346): Strategies and Significance
The Battle of Crécy marked a turning point in medieval military tactics. It took place on August 26, 1346, in northern France. King Edward III of England led his forces against a much larger French army commanded by King Philip VI. Despite being outnumbered, the English achieved a decisive victory through superior strategy and innovation.
Edward’s forces relied heavily on the longbow, a weapon that redefined medieval combat. Positioned on a hill, English archers unleashed rapid volleys that decimated the French cavalry. The longbow’s range and speed proved unmatched against the slower crossbows of Philip’s troops. French knights, bound by traditional notions of chivalry, charged repeatedly up the hill, only to be cut down in waves.
The defeat was catastrophic for France. Thousands of French knights and soldiers perished, while the English losses were minimal. The battle demonstrated the fading dominance of mounted knights and the rise of disciplined infantry and ranged weapons. Crécy also cemented English confidence, significantly advancing Edward’s campaign in northern France.
Battle of Poitiers (1356): Events and Consequences
The Battle of Poitiers, fought on September 19, 1356, showcased another English triumph under the leadership of Edward, the Black Prince, son of Edward III. Like Crécy, this battle highlighted the effective use of the longbow and disciplined defensive tactics.
The Black Prince’s army, though outnumbered, was strategically positioned near Poitiers. The French, led by King John II, launched a full-scale assault, underestimating the English defenses. English archers again unleashed a torrent of arrows, creating chaos amid French ranks. Once the French forces were disorganized, Edward’s men launched a counterattack that broke the French line.
King John II was captured in the chaos, along with hundreds of French nobles. His capture was a devastating blow to France, leaving the country leaderless and financially strained. The Treaty of Brétigny (1360) followed, granting England substantial territorial gains and a hefty ransom for the king’s release. However, the treaty’s terms sowed resentment and failed to end the conflict, ensuring the war would continue.
Battle of Agincourt (1415): Tactics and Implications
The Battle of Agincourt is perhaps the most iconic battle of the Hundred Years’ War. Fought on October 25, 1415, it was a stunning victory for England under King Henry V. With a tired and outnumbered army, Henry’s leadership and the strategic use of terrain and weaponry delivered an unforgettable result.
The English army, weakened by disease and fatigue, set up a defensive position on narrow, muddy ground. This left no room for the French to use their superior numbers effectively. Once again, English longbowmen played a critical role, raining arrows onto advancing French knights. The muddy terrain bogged down the heavily-armored French, turning the battlefield into a slaughter.
The French suffered devastating losses, including thousands of noblemen. In contrast, English casualties were minimal. Agincourt cemented Henry V’s reputation as a brilliant military leader and revived English ambitions in France. The victory also influenced warfare, with knights increasingly sidelined by more versatile and cost-efficient infantry forces.
The battle demonstrated how morale, leadership, and preparation could overcome seemingly impossible odds. For France, it was another humiliating loss, but it underscored the urgent need for reforms in leadership and warfare tactics.
Influence of Joan of Arc
Few figures in the Hundred Years’ War command as much attention as Joan of Arc. Her life was brief but transformative, marking a turning point for France during its darkest hour. Against all odds, Joan emerged as a symbol of hope, altering the morale and strategy of French forces when defeat seemed inevitable.
Rise to Prominence: How Joan of Arc Emerged as a Leader
Joan of Arc’s rise is nothing short of extraordinary. Born to a peasant family in 1412 in Domrémy, she had no formal training in politics or war. Yet, by the age of 17, she was leading armies and addressing kings. What set her apart? Her unwavering belief that she was guided by divine voices.
In 1429, France was in chaos. The English had occupied large portions of the country, and the French crown was weak, its legitimacy in question. Joan claimed that Saint Michael, Saint Catherine, and Saint Margaret had instructed her to help crown Charles VII as king and drive out the English. Despite her humble origins, her conviction and charisma convinced local leaders to bring her to Charles VII.
Meeting with Charles, Joan accurately described details of his private prayers—something she couldn’t have known without prior access. Her insights and persistence convinced the king and his advisors that she was more than a simple peasant. Against the advice of many nobles, Charles entrusted her with troops. This moment marked the beginning of her ascent as both a leader and a beacon of French resistance.
Key Victories and Legacy: Her Role in History
Joan’s impact was immediate and undeniable. Her first major test came at the Siege of Orléans in 1429. French morale was low after a series of devastating defeats, and the city’s fall seemed inevitable. Joan’s arrival turned despair into optimism. Clad in white armor and carrying her banner, her presence inspired soldiers to fight harder.
The French army, under Joan’s leadership, launched a series of bold attacks. Within just nine days, they broke the siege and forced the English to retreat. This victory wasn’t just military; it was deeply symbolic. It gave France momentum, showing that victory was possible and that divine favor, as many believed, was on their side.
Soon after, Joan led the French in a string of victories, paving the way for Charles VII’s coronation at Reims. The ceremony, attended by Joan, solidified Charles’s legitimacy as king and unified France under his rule. Joan’s role here was pivotal—without her, the coronation might never have happened.
Joan’s legacy didn’t end with her military achievements. Even after her capture in 1430 by Burgundian forces allied with the English, she remained a symbol of hope. Tried and executed for heresy in 1431, Joan was later vindicated, her trial declared unjust. In 1920, she was canonized as a saint.
But more than her sainthood, Joan’s influence endures as a figure of courage, determination, and unity. She showed that leadership wasn’t limited by birth or status. Her efforts revived French morale, shifted the momentum of the Hundred Years’ War, and helped shape the future of France.
Political Changes and Outcomes
The end of the Hundred Years’ War brought sweeping political changes to England and France, reshaping the governance and power of both kingdoms. From treaties to strengthened monarchies, these shifts laid the groundwork for modern nation-states.
Treaty of Picquigny (1475): Discuss the treaty that ended the war and its terms.
The Treaty of Picquigny, signed on August 29, 1475, marked the formal end of hostilities between England and France. It was more a political arrangement than a grand conclusion, reflecting the fatigue of two kingdoms drained by decades of war. The treaty was negotiated between England’s King Edward IV and France’s King Louis XI, as both sought to resolve conflict without further bloodshed.
Under the terms of the treaty:
- Louis XI agreed to pay Edward IV a lump sum of 75,000 crowns and an annual pension of 50,000 crowns.
- The payment was framed as a “tribute” to ensure peace, though it essentially bought Edward’s withdrawal from France.
- A marriage agreement was proposed between the French Dauphin (heir to the throne) and Edward IV’s daughter, although it never materialized.
- English forces were to leave French territories, guaranteeing an immediate cessation of war.
The treaty demonstrated the practical limits of conquest. Despite moments of dominance, England lacked the resources for lasting control over French lands. For France, it secured the king’s authority and allowed the monarchy to focus on internal stability. While it ended the war, the treaty also symbolized England’s declining role in continental politics, moving its future conflicts inward toward domestic struggles.
Rise of Strong Monarchies: Explore how the war led to stronger centralized powers in England and France.
The Hundred Years’ War fundamentally changed how power was distributed in both nations. Long years of conflict forced monarchs to consolidate control, creating stronger centralized governments.
In France, the war left an enduring mark on royal power. The French monarchy capitalized on national unity forged in the face of invasion. Kings expanded their authority while suppressing regional independence. Feudal lords, once powerful enough to challenge the crown, saw their influence wane as the monarchy grew stronger. This rise in centralization enabled France to emerge as a consolidated kingdom by the late 15th century.
Key factors behind this shift included:
- Reclaiming Territories: By war’s end, French kings regained most lands occupied by England, uniting the kingdom geographically.
- Taxes for Stability: The war spurred permanent taxes, like the “taille,” which funded standing armies and reduced dependence on noble forces.
- Common Purpose: Figures like Joan of Arc fostered a shared sense of national unity, further centralizing the monarchy’s role.
In England, the war’s outcome had an opposite but no less significant impact. Losing French territories shifted focus on internal governance. Wars abroad had drained resources, and the monarchy faced growing dissent at home. Through this, England began developing parliamentary institutions that would later expand their role in governance.
Notable changes in England included:
- Loss of French Holdings: Defeat in the war brought the realization that maintaining vast foreign possessions was untenable.
- Wars of the Roses: The power vacuum after the war planted seeds for a civil war, forcing the crown to reassert authority.
- Professional Armies: The reliance on temporary armies during the war led to the formation of more defined and loyal forces over time.
Both kingdoms emerged transformed. France centralized its monarchy into a dominant force, while England laid the foundations for more structured governance. These differing outcomes reflect how the shared trauma of centuries of war shaped their futures in distinct ways.
Cultural Impact of the War
The Hundred Years’ War was not only a conflict of swords and strategy—it left an enduring mark on culture. Across Europe, the war inspired literature and art that reflected the struggles, tragedies, and aspirations of the time. Writers and artists channeled the chaos and heroism into work that shaped the cultural memory of the conflict for generations.
Literary Works: Notable Works Inspired by the War
The Hundred Years’ War heavily influenced literature, as authors sought to document events, reflect on human suffering, or celebrate national pride. Some works from this period became essential pieces of medieval literature, capturing the spirit of an era defined by war.
- Christine de Pizan: As one of Europe’s first known female authors, Christine wrote several works during the war. Her book Ditié de Jeanne d’Arc (1429) was a poetic tribute to Joan of Arc’s role in lifting French spirits and leading her nation. Christine’s writing captured the nationalistic fervor that arose as France began to unify.
- Jean Froissart’s Chronicles: Froissart’s Chronicles remain one of the most detailed accounts of the war’s battles and political twists. Written in the 14th century, his narratives offer a vivid, firsthand perspective of knights, kings, and armies. While his work contains bias as he supported the nobility, it gives historians a glimpse into the medieval mindset.
- Growth of English Literature: The war also catalyzed a rise in literature written in English rather than French or Latin, signaling pride in the emerging national identity. This language shift set the stage for later writers like Geoffrey Chaucer, who drew inspiration from themes like chivalry and social change.
Literature wasn’t just about entertaining—these works provided people with a way to process loss, celebrate faith, or envision brighter futures. They were the stories through which people made sense of a turbulent world.
Artistic Representations: How Artists Portrayed the Conflict
The war also shaped European art, with the conflict depicted in everything from tapestries to illuminated manuscripts. Visual art not only preserved key moments but also conveyed messages about valor, faith, and the consequences of war.
- Illuminated Manuscripts: War scenes frequently appeared in illuminated manuscripts, many of which were commissioned for religious or noble patrons. For example, the Grandes Chroniques de France featured richly illustrated depictions of battles like Crécy and Agincourt, blending historical storytelling with artistry. These images emphasized the heroism of kings and the divine justice of their causes.
- Tapestries: One of the most famous methods of immortalizing the war was through woven tapestries. These colorful creations often depicted knights in battle or great leaders like King Edward III or Henry V. The tapestries were displayed in castles and courts, serving as both decoration and propaganda.
- Stained Glass in Churches: Victory and faith were often celebrated through stained glass art in cathedrals. For instance, depictions of Joan of Arc began appearing in churches by the late medieval period, sanctifying her role in defending France. These windows weren’t just art—they were a reminder to the faithful of divine support in human struggles.
Art during this time wasn’t created in isolation—it was often used to bolster royal narratives or reinforce the moral purpose of war. The images of knights and battles tied into broader themes of heroism, unity, and divine intervention, leaving lasting impressions on European culture.
The war didn’t just shape borders; it shaped how people imagined themselves and their histories. In both literature and art, the echoes of the Hundred Years’ War continue to resonate, offering a window into the fears and hopes of those who lived through it.
Conclusion of the Hundred Years’ War
The conclusion of the Hundred Years’ War in 1453 marked the end of one of history’s most prolonged conflicts. Spanning over a century, the war profoundly shaped the destinies of both England and France. By its end, the political and military dynamics of Europe were forever altered. This section examines key events leading to the war’s close and its immediate outcomes.
Final Phase of the Conflict
By the mid-15th century, the tide had shifted decisively in favor of the French. A combination of French resilience, strategic leadership, and England’s internal strife led to the war’s ending.
- French Recovery: Under King Charles VII, France regrouped and restructured its military. The creation of a standing army strengthened its ability to defend against English attacks. New artillery technology gave France a critical advantage in sieges, helping to reclaim lost territory.
- English Weakness: England faced mounting challenges at home, including political instability and depleted financial resources. The Wars of the Roses, a civil war between rival factions of the English nobility, diverted attention and resources away from the conflict in France. England was unable to sustain its campaigns abroad.
- End of English Presence in France: The decisive Battle of Castillon in 1453 delivered a final blow to England’s territorial ambitions in France. The French victory effectively ended English control in Aquitaine, leaving only the port of Calais under English rule. This marked the end of major fighting in the war.
Shifting Borders and Territorial Control
By the conclusion of the war, the territorial map of France had changed dramatically. Lands that had been under English control for decades were now firmly in French hands.
- Loss of English Territories: England lost nearly all its territories in France, barring Calais. Once sprawling Anglo-French domains were reduced to a single border outpost.
- French Reclamation: The consolidation of French territories under Charles VII allowed France to emerge as a unified kingdom. Reclaimed regions, including Normandy, Aquitaine, and Gascony, consolidated the crown’s power.
This territorial shift marked the end of England’s ambitions to rule over French lands. It also strengthened France’s position as the dominant power on the continent.
Legacy of the Conflict’s End
The closing chapter of the Hundred Years’ War left deep and lasting effects on both nations. While the battles had ceased, the consequences of the war shaped their futures in enduring ways.
- Military Evolution: The war revolutionized medieval warfare. The prominence of knights dwindled as professional armies and new weapon technologies, such as cannons, came to define the battlefield.
- National Identity: France emerged more united, with a stronger sense of national pride. For England, the war’s end shifted focus inward, leading to significant domestic developments.
The Hundred Years’ War didn’t just alter borders; it reshaped how England and France perceived themselves and one another. The conflict’s conclusion marked the beginning of a new era for both kingdoms.
Conclusion
The Hundred Years’ War reshaped England and France, defining their paths as distinct nations. It solidified France as a centralized power with clearer national identity and control over its lands. For England, the loss of French territories refocused attention inward, influencing domestic politics and governance. The war marked the end of medieval combat dominated by knights, ushering in professional armies and new technologies. Its legacy lives on in the cultural and political foundations of both countries.